PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDO vs. DAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRDO vs. DAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 74.31% return, which is significantly higher than DAC's 41.54% return.


CRDO

1D
-5.27%
1M
35.91%
YTD
74.31%
6M
74.28%
1Y
241.28%
3Y*
142.90%
5Y*
10Y*

DAC

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
41.54%
6M
41.94%
1Y
52.23%
3Y*
31.85%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDO vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
74.31%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%
DAC
Danaos Corporation
41.54%22.24%12.41%47.51%-31.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDO and DAC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.20

The correlation between CRDO and DAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRDO:

$48.33B

DAC:

$2.39B

EPS

CRDO:

$2.50

DAC:

$28.34

PE Ratio

CRDO:

100.50

DAC:

4.63

PS Ratio

CRDO:

35.55

DAC:

2.31

PB Ratio

CRDO:

23.42

DAC:

0.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRDO:

$1.34B

DAC:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRDO:

$908.35M

DAC:

$705.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRDO:

$463.79M

DAC:

$739.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRDO vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DAC
DAC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDO vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRDODACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

4.52

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

14.35

-3.59

CRDO vs. DAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the DAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDO and DAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRDO vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and DAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDODACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.04%

-99.42%

+37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.59%

-12.58%

-41.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.05%

-28.87%

-32.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-66.36%

+61.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-80.43%

+61.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.17%

3.95%

+18.22%

Volatility

CRDO vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to Danaos Corporation (DAC) at 6.04%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRDODACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

6.04%

+22.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.16%

16.51%

+48.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.70%

21.41%

+64.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.50%

34.36%

+47.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.50%

65.00%

+16.50%

Dividends

CRDO vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison

CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DAC
Danaos Corporation
2.70%3.66%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%

Financials

CRDO vs. DAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Danaos Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
437.00M
253.70M
(CRDO) Total Revenue
(DAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRDO vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Danaos Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
68.2%
59.3%
Portfolio components
CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRDO and DAC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to DAC (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs DAC's -99.42%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRDO and DAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer