CRDL vs. LAC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CRDL (Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A) and LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) are both stocks. CRDL operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while LAC operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past year, CRDL returned -7.97% vs 12.55% for LAC. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CRDL vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDL achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -34.17% return.

CRDL

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: 20.95%
• 6M: 33.59%
• YTD: 33.15%
• 1Y: -7.97%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: -10.81%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -13.35%

LAC

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -23.67%
• 6M: -41.07%
• YTD: -34.17%
• 1Y: 12.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -32.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRDL Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A	$1.01M	$1.10M	$670.12K
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	$21.24M	$30.56M	$47.54M

CRDL vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CRDL Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A	33.15%	-25.48%	51.80%	-5.79%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-34.17%	46.80%	-53.59%	-27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDL and LAC is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRDL : $146.40M LAC : $640.81M
EPS CRDL : -CA$0.37 LAC : -$0.26
PB Ratio CRDL : 9.98 LAC : 0.75
Total Revenue (TTM) CRDL : CA$0.00 LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) CRDL : -CA$25.95K LAC : -$580.22K
EBITDA (TTM) CRDL : -CA$34.00M LAC : -$52.10M

Return for Risk

CRDL vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRDL

CRDL Risk / Return Rank: 34
CRDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CRDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CRDL Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CRDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CRDL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 56
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRDL vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRDL	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	0.09	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	1.40	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.16	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	0.16	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.61	0.25	-0.85

CRDL vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDL and LAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRDL vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDL drawdown since its inception was -92.71%, which is greater than LAC's maximum drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDL and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRDL	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.71%	-81.83%	-10.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.14%	-73.03%	+33.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-72.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.48%	-75.51%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.21%	-63.46%	-5.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.12%	47.39%	-19.27%

Volatility

CRDL vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL) has a higher volatility of 19.68% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 16.02%. This indicates that CRDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRDL	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.68%	16.02%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.48%	49.65%	-7.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.24%	131.45%	-65.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.05%	99.78%	-12.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.49%	99.78%	-13.29%

Dividends

CRDL vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRDL nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRDL and LAC in my portfolio?

CRDL and LAC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRDL or LAC?

CRDL has higher volatility (19.68%) compared to LAC (16.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDL dropped -92.71% vs LAC's -81.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.