CRDL vs. IAU
CRDL (Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A) is a stock, while IAU (iShares Gold Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 5 years, CRDL returned -15.86%/yr vs 18.02%/yr for IAU. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRDL vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDL achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -4.73% return.
CRDL
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -20.45%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- -17.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- -15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -4.73%
- 6M
- -8.68%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
CRDL vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDL Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A | 10.09% | -25.48% | 51.80% | 65.33% | -72.43% | -15.14% | -38.35% | -5.49% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -4.73% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDL and IAU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDL vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
CRDL
IAU
CRDL vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRDL | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 0.88 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 2.37 | -3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRDL vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDL drawdown since its inception was -92.71%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDL and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDL | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.71% | -45.14% | -47.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.87% | -24.40% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.73% | -24.40% | -48.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.72% | -24.40% | -66.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.04% | -23.87% | -59.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.03% | -15.97% | -53.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.09% | 9.07% | +19.02% |
Volatility
CRDL vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Cardiol Therapeutics Inc Class A (CRDL) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 8.10%. This indicates that CRDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDL | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 8.10% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.08% | 24.23% | +15.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.84% | 27.38% | +41.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.06% | 18.18% | +68.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.79% | 15.98% | +70.81% |
Dividends
CRDL vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRDL nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDL and IAU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDL has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to IAU (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDL dropped -92.71% vs IAU's -45.14%.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDL and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer