CRCL vs. MLPX
CRCL (Circle Internet Group, Inc.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past year, CRCL returned -66.37% vs 29.12% for MLPX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CRCL vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCL achieves a -17.16% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 27.47% return.
CRCL
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -21.21%
- 6M
- -22.54%
- YTD
- -17.16%
- 1Y
- -66.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- YTD
- 27.47%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 27.98%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
CRCL vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCL Circle Internet Group, Inc. | -17.16% | 14.93% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.47% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCL and MLPX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCL vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
CRCL
MLPX
CRCL vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCL | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 3.58 | -4.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 8.43 | -9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCL vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCL drawdown since its inception was -80.93%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCL and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCL | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.93% | -70.67% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.63% | -8.18% | -70.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.07% | -2.72% | -72.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -16.52% | -38.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.74% | 3.46% | +53.28% |
Volatility
CRCL vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) has a higher volatility of 27.37% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.96%. This indicates that CRCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCL | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.37% | 5.96% | +21.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.71% | 12.36% | +62.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.18% | 15.76% | +82.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.69% | 20.00% | +95.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.69% | 26.15% | +89.54% |
Dividends
CRCL vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
CRCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCL Circle Internet Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCL and MLPX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRCL has higher volatility (27.37%) compared to MLPX (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRCL dropped -80.93% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRCL and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer