CRCL vs. BMNR
CRCL (Circle Internet Group, Inc.) and BMNR (BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past year, CRCL returned -66.37% vs -60.47% for BMNR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CRCL vs. BMNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCL achieves a -17.16% return, which is significantly higher than BMNR's -41.84% return.
CRCL
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -21.21%
- 6M
- -22.54%
- YTD
- -17.16%
- 1Y
- -66.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNR
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- 6M
- -51.65%
- YTD
- -41.84%
- 1Y
- -60.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCL vs. BMNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCL Circle Internet Group, Inc. | -17.16% | 14.93% |
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | -41.84% | 274.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCL and BMNR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CRCL and BMNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRCL:
$17.56B
BMNR:
$8.99B
CRCL:
-$0.50
BMNR:
-$22.73
CRCL:
3.65
BMNR:
99.39
CRCL:
$2.86B
BMNR:
$61.19M
CRCL:
$57.27M
BMNR:
$51.09M
CRCL:
-$129.43M
BMNR:
-$3.61B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCL vs. BMNR — Risk / Return Rank
CRCL
BMNR
CRCL vs. BMNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCL | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.93 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.77 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | -1.13 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCL vs. BMNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCL drawdown since its inception was -80.93%, smaller than the maximum BMNR drawdown of -90.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCL and BMNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCL | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.93% | -90.14% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.63% | -78.94% | +0.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.07% | -88.30% | +13.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -72.20% | +16.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.74% | 53.51% | +3.23% |
Volatility
CRCL vs. BMNR - Volatility Comparison
Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) has a higher volatility of 27.37% compared to BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) at 22.43%. This indicates that CRCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCL | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.37% | 22.43% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.71% | 58.67% | +16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.18% | 99.91% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.69% | 683.68% | -567.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.69% | 683.68% | -567.99% |
Dividends
CRCL vs. BMNR - Dividend Comparison
CRCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BMNR BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.04% |
CRCL Circle Internet Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRCL vs. BMNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Circle Internet Group, Inc. and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCL and BMNR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRCL has higher volatility (27.37%) compared to BMNR (22.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRCL dropped -80.93% vs BMNR's -90.14%.
BMNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRCL and BMNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer