PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCL vs. FIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRCL vs. FIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and Figma, Inc (FIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCL achieves a -21.05% return, which is significantly higher than FIG's -34.92% return.


CRCL

1D
-2.54%
1M
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
YTD
-21.05%
1Y
-62.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.09%

FIG

1D
2.36%
1M
13.96%
6M
-6.17%
YTD
-34.92%
1Y
-80.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-71.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$702.83M$808.48M$1.37B
$427.54M$501.94M$462.44M

CRCL vs. FIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRCL
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
-21.05%-58.37%
FIG
Figma, Inc
-34.92%-56.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCL and FIG is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRCL:

$16.74B

FIG:

$11.86B

EPS

CRCL:

-$0.50

FIG:

-$2.88

PS Ratio

CRCL:

3.47

FIG:

10.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRCL:

$2.86B

FIG:

$1.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRCL:

$57.27M

FIG:

$926.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRCL:

-$129.43M

FIG:

-$1.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCL vs. FIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRCL
CRCL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CRCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CRCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRCL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FIG
FIG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRCL vs. FIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and Figma, Inc (FIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRCLFIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.80

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.92

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

-1.10

-0.39

CRCL vs. FIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRCL Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the FIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRCL and FIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRCL vs. FIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCL drawdown since its inception was -80.93%, smaller than the maximum FIG drawdown of -86.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCL and FIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCLFIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.93%

-86.20%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.12%

-86.20%

+16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.23%

-80.07%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.19%

-69.85%

+13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.25%

71.65%

-23.40%

Volatility

CRCL vs. FIG - Volatility Comparison

Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL) and Figma, Inc (FIG) have volatilities of 23.26% and 24.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCLFIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.26%

24.31%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.49%

59.29%

+16.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.15%

93.89%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

114.67%

93.89%

+20.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.67%

93.89%

+20.78%

Dividends

CRCL vs. FIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRCL nor FIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRCL vs. FIG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Circle Internet Group, Inc. and Figma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CRCL vs. FIG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Circle Internet Group, Inc. and Figma, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CRCL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Circle Internet Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 694.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 264.77M and revenue of 333.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.4%.

CRCL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Circle Internet Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 45.00M and revenue of 694.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.

FIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -137.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.2%.

CRCL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Circle Internet Group, Inc. reported a net income of 55.25M and revenue of 694.13M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

FIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -142.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in a net margin of -42.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRCL and FIG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIG has higher volatility (24.31%) compared to CRCL (23.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRCL dropped -80.93% vs FIG's -86.20%.

CRCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCL and FIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer