PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIG vs. CRWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FIG vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Figma, Inc (FIG) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIG vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FIG
Figma, Inc
-43.43%-67.65%
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
8.18%-37.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIG:

$10.80B

CRWV:

$33.78B

EPS

FIG:

-$2.64

CRWV:

-$2.46

PS Ratio

FIG:

9.95

CRWV:

7.15

PB Ratio

FIG:

7.15

CRWV:

10.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIG:

$1.06B

CRWV:

$5.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIG:

$870.26M

CRWV:

$3.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

FIG:

-$1.25B

CRWV:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIG achieves a -43.43% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's 8.18% return.


FIG

1D
4.86%
1M
-28.07%
YTD
-43.43%
6M
-59.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRWV

1D
12.03%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
8.18%
6M
-43.39%
1Y
108.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIG vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figma, Inc (FIG) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FIG vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGCRWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

0.79

-1.84

Correlation

The correlation between FIG and CRWV is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FIG vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIG nor CRWV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FIG vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIG drawdown since its inception was -83.48%, which is greater than CRWV's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG and CRWV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGCRWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.48%

-64.84%

-18.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.67%

-57.80%

-24.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-36.60%

-27.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.00%

Volatility

FIG vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIGCRWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.86%

119.44%

-31.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.86%

119.44%

-31.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.86%

119.44%

-31.58%

Financials

FIG vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Figma, Inc and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
303.78M
1.57B
(FIG) Total Revenue
(CRWV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIG vs. CRWV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Figma, Inc and CoreWeave, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%October2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
82.1%
67.6%
Portfolio components
FIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 249.47M and revenue of 303.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.

CRWV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

FIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -195.50M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.4%.

CRWV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -89.59M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.

FIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -226.56M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in a net margin of -74.6%.

CRWV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -451.73M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of -28.7%.