CRCD vs. NVDQ
CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDQ.
Performance
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -88.01% return, which is significantly lower than NVDQ's -36.13% return.
CRCD
- 1D
- 20.12%
- 1M
- 35.97%
- YTD
- -88.01%
- 6M
- -87.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDQ
- 1D
- 7.09%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -36.13%
- 6M
- -41.91%
- 1Y
- -68.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -88.01% | 43.19% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -36.13% | -16.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCD and NVDQ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCD vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank
CRCD
NVDQ
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRCD | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -0.89 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and NVDQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCD | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.95% | -99.45% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -73.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.31% | -99.35% | +5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.51% | -88.21% | +33.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 48.57% | — |
Volatility
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCD | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 51.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 204.54% | 67.86% | +136.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 204.54% | 95.52% | +109.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 204.54% | 95.52% | +109.02% |
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCD vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison
CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.41% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCD and NVDQ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 1.05% for NVDQ.
Find the right allocation for CRCD and NVDQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer