CRC vs. CNQ
CRC (California Resources Corporation) and CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, CRC returned 16.66%/yr vs 30.04%/yr for CNQ. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRC vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRC achieves a 18.94% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 39.19% return.
CRC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.78%
CNQ
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 16.50%
- 6M
- 25.71%
- YTD
- 39.19%
- 1Y
- 57.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 30.04%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $309.57M | $341.08M | $362.23M | |
| $39.54M | $37.44M | $45.57M |
CRC vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRC California Resources Corporation | 18.94% | -10.78% | -2.57% | 28.85% | 3.69% | 81.82% | 18.25% |
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 39.19% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | 48.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRC and CNQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CRC and CNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CRC:
$4.66B
CNQ:
$96.32B
CRC:
$4.23
CNQ:
CA$4.66
CRC:
12.42
CNQ:
13.92
CRC:
1.30
CNQ:
3.32
CRC:
$3.48B
CNQ:
CA$40.74B
CRC:
$1.30B
CNQ:
CA$12.53B
CRC:
$1.34B
CNQ:
CA$22.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRC vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank
CRC
CNQ
CRC vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Resources Corporation (CRC) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRC | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 2.67 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 8.13 | -7.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRC vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRC drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, smaller than the maximum CNQ drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRC and CNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRC | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.75% | -80.75% | +36.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.23% | -21.45% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.75% | -35.85% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.75% | -35.85% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.67% | -6.80% | -17.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -23.46% | +11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.58% | 7.04% | +7.54% |
Volatility
CRC vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for California Resources Corporation (CRC) is 9.20%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that CRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRC | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.20% | 10.35% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.95% | 24.00% | +2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.15% | 30.54% | +4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.95% | 32.81% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.41% | 40.26% | +4.15% |
Dividends
CRC vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison
CRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than CNQ's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.82% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
CRC California Resources Corporation | 3.05% | 3.51% | 2.69% | 2.12% | 1.82% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRC vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Resources Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRC vs. CNQ - Profitability Comparison
CRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 309.00M and revenue of 871.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
CRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 159.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
CRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a net income of 12.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRC and CNQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNQ has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to CRC (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRC dropped -44.75% vs CNQ's -80.75%.
CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRC and CNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer