CNQ vs. CSU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNQ or CSU.TO.
Key characteristics
| CNQ | CSU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.14% | 10.78% |
| 1Y Return | 42.51% | 39.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 40.72% | 27.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 28.51% | 28.37% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.95% | 33.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 1.52 |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.77% | 22.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.38% | -25.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.32% | -5.55% |
Fundamentals
| CNQ | CSU.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $83.52B | CA$77.03B |
| EPS | $5.45 | CA$36.71 |
| PE Ratio | 14.31 | 99.02 |
| PEG Ratio | 12.75 | 2.04 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35.97B | CA$8.41B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $23.61B | CA$2.32B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $16.51B | CA$1.60B |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and CSU.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CNQ vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than CSU.TO's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has underperformed CSU.TO with an annualized return of 10.95%, while CSU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 33.83% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNQ vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNQ vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than CSU.TO's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.83% | 4.17% | 6.29% | 3.69% | 5.14% | 3.42% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.19% | 3.20% | 2.58% | 1.60% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 2.84% | 31.30% | 7.53% | 8.63% | 10.78% | 19,020.03% | 19.05% | 29.24% |
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -81.38%, which is greater than CSU.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and CSU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNQ vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is 5.47%, while Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that CNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNQ vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities