PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRC vs. TRMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRC vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California Resources Corporation (CRC) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRC achieves a 40.97% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 51.10% return.


CRC

1D
0.79%
1M
-9.48%
YTD
40.97%
6M
32.02%
1Y
40.28%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
17.99%
10Y*

TRMD

1D
0.11%
1M
-12.81%
YTD
51.10%
6M
38.71%
1Y
87.62%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
42.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRC vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRC
California Resources Corporation
40.97%-10.78%-2.57%28.85%3.69%81.82%57.27%
TRMD
TORM plc
51.10%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%12.91%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CRC and TRMD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.26

Fundamentals

EPS

CRC:

$4.17

TRMD:

$3.40

PE Ratio

CRC:

14.92

TRMD:

8.28

PS Ratio

CRC:

1.56

TRMD:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRC:

$3.48B

TRMD:

$1.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRC:

$1.30B

TRMD:

$575.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRC:

$1.34B

TRMD:

$639.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRC vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRC
CRC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRC vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Resources Corporation (CRC) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRCTRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.39

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

11.44

-7.86

CRC vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRC Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRC and TRMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRCTRMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.32

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.93

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.48

+0.26

Drawdowns

CRC vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRC drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, smaller than the maximum TRMD drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRC and TRMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCTRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.75%

-60.59%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.04%

-20.06%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.75%

-60.59%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.75%

-60.59%

+15.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.71%

-17.33%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-22.58%

+10.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.30%

7.69%

+3.61%

Volatility

CRC vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

California Resources Corporation (CRC) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to TORM plc (TRMD) at 14.52%. This indicates that CRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCTRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.55%

14.52%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.71%

27.84%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.96%

38.07%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.45%

46.00%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.44%

59.90%

-16.46%

Dividends

CRC vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

CRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than TRMD's 8.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CRC
California Resources Corporation
2.58%3.51%2.69%2.12%1.82%0.40%0.00%
TRMD
TORM plc
8.59%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%

Financials

CRC vs. TRMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Resources Corporation and TORM plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
871.00M
395.84M
(CRC) Total Revenue
(TRMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRC vs. TRMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between California Resources Corporation and TORM plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
39.9%
Portfolio components
CRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 309.00M and revenue of 871.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

TRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 157.74M and revenue of 395.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

CRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 159.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

TRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 135.10M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.

CRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, California Resources Corporation reported a net income of 12.00M and revenue of 871.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

TRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 120.52M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRC and TRMD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRC has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to TRMD (14.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRC dropped -44.75% vs TRMD's -60.59%.

TRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRC and TRMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer