CNQ vs. IMO
CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) and IMO (Imperial Oil Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — CNQ in Oil & Gas E&P, IMO in Oil & Gas Integrated. Over the past 10 years, CNQ returned 18.26%/yr vs 17.58%/yr for IMO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CNQ vs. IMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 42.17% return, which is significantly lower than IMO's 47.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNQ having a 18.26% annualized return and IMO not far behind at 17.58%.
CNQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 42.17%
- 6M
- 42.84%
- 1Y
- 59.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 27.16%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
IMO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 47.08%
- 6M
- 31.96%
- 1Y
- 75.73%
- 3Y*
- 41.39%
- 5Y*
- 33.20%
- 10Y*
- 17.58%
CNQ vs. IMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 42.17% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | -19.06% | 39.72% | -29.92% | 15.97% |
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 47.08% | 43.85% | 10.47% | 20.89% | 38.00% | 95.29% | -25.37% | 7.16% | -17.21% | -8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and IMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2000 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CNQ and IMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CNQ:
$99.96B
IMO:
$61.22B
CNQ:
$4.65
IMO:
$5.87
CNQ:
10.25
IMO:
21.51
CNQ:
0.49
IMO:
0.47
CNQ:
2.44
IMO:
1.35
CNQ:
2.23
IMO:
2.69
CNQ:
$40.74B
IMO:
$46.55B
CNQ:
$12.53B
IMO:
$7.69B
CNQ:
$22.99B
IMO:
$6.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQ vs. IMO — Risk / Return Rank
CNQ
IMO
CNQ vs. IMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNQ | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.81 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.55 | 3.41 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 4.61 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 14.21 | -4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNQ | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.81 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.02 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.44 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. IMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, roughly equal to the maximum IMO drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and IMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQ | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -84.82% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.16% | -16.51% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -22.95% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -29.72% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.84% | -76.96% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -8.72% | +3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.53% | -21.19% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 5.35% | +0.78% |
Volatility
CNQ vs. IMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is 9.27%, while Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that CNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNQ | IMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 10.45% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.57% | 22.22% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 27.08% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.79% | 32.61% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 35.56% | +4.71% |
Dividends
CNQ vs. IMO - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than IMO's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.65% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 1.75% | 2.40% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 2.30% | 2.28% | 3.50% | 2.41% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.66% |
Financials
CNQ vs. IMO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Imperial Oil Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNQ vs. IMO - Profitability Comparison
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
IMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 2.51B and revenue of 12.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
IMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
IMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 940.00M and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNQ and IMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMO has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to CNQ (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNQ dropped -80.75% vs IMO's -84.82%.
IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNQ and IMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer