CNQ vs. IMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNQ or IMO.
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and IMO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNQ vs. IMO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CNQ:
-0.11
IMO:
0.49
CNQ:
0.03
IMO:
0.82
CNQ:
1.00
IMO:
1.10
CNQ:
-0.11
IMO:
0.61
CNQ:
-0.25
IMO:
1.98
CNQ:
11.89%
IMO:
6.63%
CNQ:
26.43%
IMO:
26.71%
CNQ:
-81.11%
IMO:
-84.96%
CNQ:
-25.54%
IMO:
-21.61%
Fundamentals
CNQ:
$64.77B
IMO:
$34.53B
CNQ:
$2.47
IMO:
$6.40
CNQ:
12.39
IMO:
10.30
CNQ:
12.75
IMO:
0.85
CNQ:
$37.25B
IMO:
$49.29B
CNQ:
$10.84B
IMO:
$7.19B
CNQ:
$17.12B
IMO:
$8.23B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a -5.45% return, which is significantly lower than IMO's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has outperformed IMO with an annualized return of 11.56%, while IMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.75% annualized return.
CNQ
-5.45%
-11.35%
-12.11%
-4.53%
19.97%
11.56%
IMO
10.71%
-18.19%
-5.19%
12.54%
22.47%
5.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNQ vs. IMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNQ vs. IMO - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than IMO's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 5.22% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.70% | 5.15% | 3.42% | 5.92% | 2.34% | 2.19% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 1.62% |
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 2.84% | 2.50% | 2.30% | 2.28% | 3.50% | 2.41% | 2.39% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.29% | 1.70% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. IMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -81.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IMO drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and IMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNQ vs. IMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is 7.94%, while Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that CNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNQ vs. IMO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Imperial Oil Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities