PortfoliosLab logo
CNQ vs. CVE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ and CVE is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNQ vs. CVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNQ:

-0.52

CVE:

-0.82

Sortino Ratio

CNQ:

-0.47

CVE:

-1.01

Omega Ratio

CNQ:

0.94

CVE:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

CNQ:

-0.42

CVE:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

CNQ:

-1.02

CVE:

-1.27

Ulcer Index

CNQ:

14.71%

CVE:

24.51%

Daily Std Dev

CNQ:

31.91%

CVE:

39.10%

Max Drawdown

CNQ:

-81.12%

CVE:

-95.01%

Current Drawdown

CNQ:

-21.71%

CVE:

-54.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNQ:

$64.05B

CVE:

$24.93B

EPS

CNQ:

$2.55

CVE:

$1.09

PE Ratio

CNQ:

11.98

CVE:

12.42

PEG Ratio

CNQ:

12.75

CVE:

0.45

PS Ratio

CNQ:

1.67

CVE:

0.46

PB Ratio

CNQ:

2.22

CVE:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNQ:

$43.23B

CVE:

$58.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNQ:

$12.09B

CVE:

$11.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNQ:

$18.38B

CVE:

$9.29B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly higher than CVE's -11.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has outperformed CVE with an annualized return of 12.08%, while CVE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.68% annualized return.


CNQ

YTD

0.73%

1M

6.53%

6M

-6.49%

1Y

-16.58%

3Y*

5.18%

5Y*

33.90%

10Y*

12.08%

CVE

YTD

-11.50%

1M

9.75%

6M

-15.75%

1Y

-31.89%

3Y*

-12.28%

5Y*

27.72%

10Y*

-0.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cenovus Energy Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNQ vs. CVE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNQ is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNQ is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CVE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CVE is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CVE is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CVE is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CVE is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CVE is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CVE is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNQ vs. CVE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is higher than the CVE Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ and CVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CNQ vs. CVE - Dividend Comparison

CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than CVE's 3.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
5.11%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.70%5.15%3.42%5.92%2.34%2.19%3.18%2.57%
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.
3.90%3.92%2.33%1.81%0.57%0.75%1.58%2.17%1.70%1.01%5.25%4.64%

Drawdowns

CNQ vs. CVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -81.12%, smaller than the maximum CVE drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and CVE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CNQ vs. CVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is 8.93%, while Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that CNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CNQ vs. CVE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
12.71B
14.21B
(CNQ) Total Revenue
(CVE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNQ vs. CVE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Cenovus Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
28.0%
21.9%
(CNQ) Gross Margin
(CVE) Gross Margin
CNQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.56B and revenue of 12.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

CVE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.11B and revenue of 14.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

CNQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 3.29B and revenue of 12.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

CVE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 14.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

CNQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 12.71B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.

CVE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a net income of 859.00M and revenue of 14.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.