PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRBN vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRBN vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRBN having a 10.92% return and RFDA slightly higher at 11.40%.


CRBN

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.91%
YTD
10.92%
6M
11.82%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
12.79%

RFDA

1D
-0.92%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.40%
6M
12.25%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRBN vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
10.92%21.85%19.29%22.31%-19.12%18.82%16.83%28.65%-9.80%23.49%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
11.40%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-9.27%19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and RFDA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016

0.86

The correlation between CRBN and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRBN vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CRBN
RFDA

Technology

32.3%
19.9%

Financial Services

18.3%
14.7%

Communication Services

9.6%
8.8%

Industrials

9.4%
8.9%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
5.0%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.8%

Energy

2.2%
12.5%

Utilities

2.2%
5.0%

Technology

CRBN
32.3%
RFDA
19.9%

Financial Services

CRBN
18.3%
RFDA
14.7%

Communication Services

CRBN
9.6%
RFDA
8.8%

Industrials

CRBN
9.4%
RFDA
8.9%

Healthcare

CRBN
8.1%
RFDA
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CRBN
7.7%
RFDA
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

CRBN
4.4%
RFDA
7.6%

Real Estate

CRBN
2.9%
RFDA
5.0%

Basic Materials

CRBN
2.5%
RFDA
1.8%

Energy

CRBN
2.2%
RFDA
12.5%

Utilities

CRBN
2.2%
RFDA
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRBN vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRBN
CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRBN vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRBNRFDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

2.55

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

3.52

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

5.44

-2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.10

19.87

-7.77

CRBN vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRBNRFDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.55

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.84

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.79

-0.10

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and RFDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRBNRFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-34.60%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-5.45%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-19.35%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-19.35%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.92%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-3.74%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.49%

+0.79%

Volatility

CRBN vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that CRBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRBNRFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.66%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

8.47%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

11.64%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

15.73%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

16.85%

+0.05%

CRBN vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRBN vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than RFDA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
1.99%2.21%1.94%2.01%1.95%1.57%1.41%2.27%2.51%2.05%2.27%2.01%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.77%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRBN and RFDA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRBN has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBN dropped -33.13% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.17% vs 11.10% for CRBN. On fees, CRBN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRBN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

CRBN has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.77% for RFDA.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRBN and 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRBN and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer