CRBN vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
CRBN and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRBN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2014. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both CRBN and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CRBN or VT.
Correlation
The correlation between CRBN and VT is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CRBN vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CRBN:
1.84
VT:
1.65
CRBN:
2.50
VT:
2.25
CRBN:
1.33
VT:
1.30
CRBN:
2.63
VT:
2.41
CRBN:
11.47
VT:
10.48
CRBN:
1.92%
VT:
1.87%
CRBN:
11.94%
VT:
11.85%
CRBN:
-33.13%
VT:
-50.27%
CRBN:
-3.23%
VT:
-3.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 17.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CRBN having a 9.59% annualized return and VT not far behind at 9.28%.
CRBN
19.89%
-0.18%
7.51%
20.83%
10.59%
9.59%
VT
17.12%
-0.90%
6.21%
17.87%
10.16%
9.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRBN vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CRBN vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CRBN vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, which matches VT's 1.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF | 1.93% | 2.01% | 1.95% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 2.05% | 2.27% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.94% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
CRBN vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CRBN vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is 3.35%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that CRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.