PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRBN vs. CNRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and CNRG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

CRBN vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
97.16%
122.98%
CRBN
CNRG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRBN:

1.84

CNRG:

-0.33

Sortino Ratio

CRBN:

2.50

CNRG:

-0.28

Omega Ratio

CRBN:

1.33

CNRG:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

CRBN:

2.63

CNRG:

-0.17

Martin Ratio

CRBN:

11.47

CNRG:

-0.74

Ulcer Index

CRBN:

1.92%

CNRG:

13.82%

Daily Std Dev

CRBN:

11.94%

CNRG:

30.59%

Max Drawdown

CRBN:

-33.13%

CNRG:

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

CRBN:

-3.23%

CNRG:

-56.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly higher than CNRG's -14.03% return.


CRBN

YTD

19.89%

1M

-0.18%

6M

7.51%

1Y

20.83%

5Y*

10.59%

10Y*

9.59%

CNRG

YTD

-14.03%

1M

-1.39%

6M

-3.51%

1Y

-13.24%

5Y*

8.93%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRBN vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.


CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
Expense ratio chart for CNRG: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%
Expense ratio chart for CRBN: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRBN vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRBN, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.84-0.33
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRBN, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.50-0.28
The chart of Omega ratio for CRBN, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.330.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRBN, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.63-0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for CRBN, currently valued at 11.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.47-0.74
CRBN
CNRG

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and CNRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.84
-0.33
CRBN
CNRG

Dividends

CRBN vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than CNRG's 1.19% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
1.93%2.01%1.95%1.57%1.41%2.26%2.51%2.05%2.27%2.01%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.19%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.23%
-56.49%
CRBN
CNRG

Volatility

CRBN vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is 3.35%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that CRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.35%
7.26%
CRBN
CNRG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab