CRBN vs. GLDM

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 25.49% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and GLDM.

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is 3.78%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that CRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.