PortfoliosLab logo
CNRG vs. LCTD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CNRG and LCTD is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CNRG vs. LCTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNRG:

-0.31

LCTD:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

CNRG:

-0.18

LCTD:

0.93

Omega Ratio

CNRG:

0.98

LCTD:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CNRG:

-0.14

LCTD:

0.74

Martin Ratio

CNRG:

-0.74

LCTD:

2.14

Ulcer Index

CNRG:

13.29%

LCTD:

4.71%

Daily Std Dev

CNRG:

34.81%

LCTD:

17.14%

Max Drawdown

CNRG:

-68.49%

LCTD:

-29.82%

Current Drawdown

CNRG:

-60.36%

LCTD:

-0.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than LCTD's 11.74% return.


CNRG

YTD

-8.42%

1M

13.98%

6M

-9.60%

1Y

-10.85%

5Y*

5.93%

10Y*

N/A

LCTD

YTD

11.74%

1M

9.28%

6M

7.98%

1Y

9.46%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNRG vs. LCTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNRG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTD's 0.20% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNRG vs. LCTD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNRG is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNRG is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNRG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNRG is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

LCTD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LCTD is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LCTD is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LCTD is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LCTD is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LCTD is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LCTD is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNRG vs. LCTD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the LCTD Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNRG and LCTD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CNRG vs. LCTD - Dividend Comparison

CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than LCTD's 3.35% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.33%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.35%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNRG vs. LCTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, which is greater than LCTD's maximum drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and LCTD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CNRG vs. LCTD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...