CNRG vs. ICLN
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
CNRG and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both CNRG and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNRG or ICLN.
Performance
CNRG vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a -15.17% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -21.84% return.
CNRG
-15.17%
-3.64%
-4.02%
-4.23%
10.25%
N/A
ICLN
-21.84%
-10.77%
-14.06%
-11.76%
3.50%
3.75%
Key characteristics
| CNRG | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.18 | -0.51 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.04 | -0.59 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.09 | -0.19 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.43 | -1.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.24% | 11.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.51% | 24.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.60% | -87.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -57.07% | -68.02% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNRG vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNRG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CNRG and ICLN is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNRG vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNRG vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than ICLN's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.75% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.81% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
CNRG vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNRG vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 9.46%. This indicates that CNRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.