CRBN vs. VHT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CRBN (iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRBN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CRBN returned 12.44%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for VHT. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CRBN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.

Performance

CRBN vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRBN achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CRBN has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 12.44%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.

CRBN

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 7.43%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 12.44%
• ALL TIME*: 11.22%

VHT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -1.17%
• 6M: 6.86%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 1Y: 27.92%
• 3Y*: 9.09%
• 5Y*: 5.06%
• 10Y*: 9.89%
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	$1.61M	$1.75M	$2.17M
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	$66.49M	$76.90M	$73.37M

CRBN vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	9.96%	21.85%	19.29%	22.31%	-19.12%	18.82%	16.83%	28.65%	-9.80%	23.49%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	6.65%	15.46%	2.66%	2.52%	-5.60%	20.57%	18.29%	21.87%	5.58%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CRBN and VHT is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between CRBN and VHT has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CRBN vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRBN	VHT
Technology	33.2%	0.4%
Financial Services	17.8%	0.0%
Industrials	9.6%	0.0%
Communication Services	8.7%	-
Healthcare	8.3%	99.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Energy	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

CRBN vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRBN

CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 62
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VHT

VHT Risk / Return Rank: 77
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRBN vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRBN	VHT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.89	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.91	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.74	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.54	6.79	+1.75

CRBN vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRBN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRBN and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRBN vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRBN drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum VHT drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRBN and VHT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRBN	VHT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-39.12%	+5.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-10.40%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	-16.91%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.04%	-17.71%	-9.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.13%	-28.85%	-4.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-2.69%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-5.96%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	4.19%	-1.77%

Volatility

CRBN vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) is 4.15%, while Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that CRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRBN	VHT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	5.54%	-1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	11.64%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.22%	15.35%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	15.25%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	17.02%	-0.15%

CRBN vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRBN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CRBN vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

CRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than VHT's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF	2.03%	2.21%	1.94%	2.01%	1.95%	1.57%	1.41%	2.27%	2.51%	2.05%	2.27%	2.01%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	1.55%	1.61%	1.53%	1.36%	1.33%	1.14%	1.21%	1.89%	1.38%	1.31%	1.45%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRBN and VHT in my portfolio?

CRBN and VHT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRBN or VHT?

VHT has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to CRBN (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRBN dropped -33.13% vs VHT's -39.12%.

Which ETF is better, CRBN or VHT?

On 10-year performance, CRBN leads with 12.44% vs 9.89% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CRBN has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRBN or VHT?

Over the 10-year period, CRBN has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRBN or VHT?

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CRBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRBN or VHT?

CRBN has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.55% for VHT.

What is the main difference between CRBN and VHT?

CRBN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. CRBN tracks MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRBN and 0.09% for VHT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.