PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQTM vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CQTM vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CQTM

1D
-5.65%
1M
-23.03%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
-8.82%
1M
-23.17%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and DRAM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.54

CQTM vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CQTM
DRAM

Technology

90.8%
58.3%

Communication Services

4.7%

-

Industrials

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-2.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CQTM
90.8%
DRAM
58.3%

Communication Services

CQTM
4.7%
DRAM

-

Industrials

CQTM
4.5%
DRAM

-

Basic Materials

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Cyclical

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Energy

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Financial Services

CQTM

-

DRAM
-2.3%

Healthcare

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Real Estate

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Utilities

CQTM

-

DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQTM vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CQTM vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQTMDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.33%

-35.16%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.33%

-35.16%

+2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-6.83%

-3.68%

Volatility

CQTM vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQTMDRAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.21%

97.73%

-12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.21%

97.73%

-12.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.21%

97.73%

-12.52%

CQTM vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CQTM vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CQTM and DRAM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

CQTM and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQTM and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer