CQTM vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

CQTM vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQTM

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -5.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: -6.52%
• 1M: 18.36%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	8.30%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	55.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and DRAM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.46

Return for Risk

CQTM vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, roughly equal to the maximum DRAM drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQTM	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.27%	-19.97%	-0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.69%	-10.95%	-2.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-3.43%	-4.00%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQTM	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.86%	93.98%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.86%	93.98%	-1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.86%	93.98%	-1.12%

CQTM vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQTM vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQTM and DRAM in my portfolio?

CQTM and DRAM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CQTM or DRAM?

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQTM or DRAM?

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQTM or DRAM?

CQTM and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CQTM and DRAM?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.65% for DRAM.