CQTM vs. EUV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Corgi Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

CQTM vs. EUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQTM

• 1D: -6.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EUV

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. EUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	16.18%
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	9.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and EUV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

CQTM vs. EUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQTM	EUV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.72	4.89	+1.83

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. EUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, which is greater than EUV's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and EUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQTM	EUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.89%	-9.34%	-5.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.55%	-0.88%	-5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-2.82%	-1.28%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQTM	EUV	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.50%	53.07%	+43.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	96.50%	53.07%	+43.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.50%	53.07%	+43.43%

CQTM vs. EUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CQTM and EUV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

CQTM vs. EUV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor EUV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQTM and EUV in my portfolio?

CQTM and EUV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CQTM or EUV?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQTM or EUV?

CQTM and EUV have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQTM or EUV?

CQTM and EUV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.