CQTM vs. WQTM

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WQTM.

Performance

CQTM vs. WQTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQTM

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -5.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WQTM

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -6.23%
• YTD: 38.45%
• 6M: 36.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. WQTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	8.30%
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and WQTM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.88

Return for Risk

CQTM vs. WQTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. WQTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum WQTM drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and WQTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQTM	WQTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.27%	-26.13%	+5.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.69%	-13.27%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-11.58%	+4.15%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQTM	WQTM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.86%	43.22%	+49.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.86%	43.22%	+49.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.86%	43.22%	+49.64%

CQTM vs. WQTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WQTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQTM vs. WQTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor WQTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQTM and WQTM in my portfolio?

CQTM and WQTM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CQTM or WQTM?

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQTM or WQTM?

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQTM or WQTM?

CQTM and WQTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CQTM and WQTM?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.45% for WQTM.