CQTM vs. SMH
CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi Funds, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. CQTM is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
CQTM vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CQTM
- 1D
- 6.57%
- 1M
- 36.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 5.76%
- 1M
- 21.31%
- YTD
- 83.23%
- 6M
- 90.62%
- 1Y
- 152.08%
- 3Y*
- 63.38%
- 5Y*
- 40.67%
- 10Y*
- 38.22%
CQTM vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 19.15% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CQTM and SMH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CQTM vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
CQTM vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CQTM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.64 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 37.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CQTM vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CQTM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -84.96% | +64.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.04% | 0.00% | -5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -41.02% | +33.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility
CQTM vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CQTM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.76% | 34.09% | +62.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.76% | 35.67% | +61.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.76% | 32.94% | +63.82% |
CQTM vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CQTM and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
CQTM vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CQTM and SMH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CQTM and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for CQTM.
CQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for CQTM and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer