CQTM vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CQTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

CQTM vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CQTM

• 1D: -11.30%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -11.79%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQTM vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	-16.43%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CQTM and ARMH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.26

Return for Risk

CQTM vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQTM	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	2.13	-1.85

Drawdowns

CQTM vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQTM drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQTM and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQTM	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.89%	-16.04%	-1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.89%	-16.04%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-3.75%	-1.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CQTM	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.00%	147.19%	-46.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.00%	147.19%	-46.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.00%	147.19%	-46.19%

CQTM vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQTM vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither CQTM nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQTM and ARMH in my portfolio?

CQTM and ARMH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CQTM or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQTM or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CQTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQTM or ARMH?

CQTM and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CQTM and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CQTM and 0.19% for ARMH.