CQP vs. CNEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CQP (Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.) is a stock, while CNEQ (Alger Concentrated Equity ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger. Over the past year, CQP returned 10.54% vs 49.78% for CNEQ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CQP vs. CNEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CQP having a 19.19% return and CNEQ slightly higher at 19.72%.

CQP

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: 19.19%
• 6M: 16.70%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 15.42%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

CNEQ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 11.24%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 6M: 19.16%
• 1Y: 49.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQP vs. CNEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.	19.19%	6.80%	15.19%
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	19.72%	33.61%	28.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CQP and CNEQ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2024	0.06

Return for Risk

CQP vs. CNEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQP

CQP Risk / Return Rank: 52
CQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CQP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CQP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CNEQ

CNEQ Risk / Return Rank: 57
CNEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CNEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CNEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CNEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CNEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQP vs. CNEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CQP	CNEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	2.22	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.84	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.37	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	2.59	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	8.16	-6.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CQP vs. CNEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the CNEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQP and CNEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQP	CNEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	2.22	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	1.51	-1.15

Drawdowns

CQP vs. CNEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, which is greater than CNEQ's maximum drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and CNEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQP	CNEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.46%	-27.58%	-50.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.72%	-19.30%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.43%	-0.91%	-9.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-4.89%	-9.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	6.12%	+1.46%

Volatility

CQP vs. CNEQ - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) at 6.55%. This indicates that CQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CQP	CNEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.27%	6.55%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.29%	17.19%	+2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.98%	22.51%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.38%	26.62%	+5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.12%	26.62%	+5.50%

Dividends

CQP vs. CNEQ - Dividend Comparison

CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than CNEQ's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	0.44%	0.52%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.	5.27%	6.15%	5.06%	8.36%	6.82%	6.30%	7.28%	6.08%	6.07%	5.79%	5.90%	6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQP and CNEQ in my portfolio?

CQP and CNEQ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CQP or CNEQ?

CQP has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to CNEQ (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQP dropped -78.46% vs CNEQ's -27.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.