CPAI vs. FLQL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CPAI (Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF) and FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPAI is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Counterpoint, while FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. CPAI is actively managed, while FLQL is passively managed. Over the past year, CPAI returned 44.76% vs 22.61% for FLQL. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CPAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLQL.

Performance

CPAI vs. FLQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 26.13% return, which is significantly higher than FLQL's 11.68% return.

CPAI

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -0.84%
• 6M: 17.38%
• YTD: 26.13%
• 1Y: 44.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.02%

FLQL

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 1Y: 22.61%
• 3Y*: 20.52%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPAI Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF	$4.18M	$3.24M	$3.18M
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	$7.90M	$6.01M	$6.42M

CPAI vs. FLQL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CPAI Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF	26.13%	17.79%	28.37%	5.67%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	11.68%	19.64%	24.33%	4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and FLQL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023	0.74

The correlation between CPAI and FLQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

CPAI vs. FLQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CPAI	FLQL
Technology	34.1%	39.4%
Healthcare	28.0%	10.2%
Energy	12.0%	2.6%
Industrials	8.1%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	3.4%
Communication Services	4.0%	10.5%
Basic Materials	3.9%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	8.9%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.7%
Financial Services	1.9%	9.6%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

CPAI vs. FLQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPAI

CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 88
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 68
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPAI vs. FLQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPAI	FLQL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.49	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.14	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.27	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	2.32	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.90	10.31	+4.59

CPAI vs. FLQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the FLQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and FLQL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. FLQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum FLQL drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and FLQL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPAI	FLQL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.46%	-33.64%	+12.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.48%	-9.05%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	-1.70%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-4.00%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	2.04%	+0.84%

Volatility

CPAI vs. FLQL - Volatility Comparison

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) at 4.39%. This indicates that CPAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPAI	FLQL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	4.39%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.27%	11.43%	+4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.63%	14.10%	+5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.43%	16.30%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	17.49%	+1.94%

CPAI vs. FLQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPAI vs. FLQL - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FLQL's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPAI Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF	0.71%	0.89%	0.41%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.04%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPAI and FLQL in my portfolio?

CPAI and FLQL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPAI or FLQL?

CPAI has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to FLQL (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPAI dropped -21.46% vs FLQL's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, CPAI or FLQL?

On 1-year performance, CPAI leads with 44.76% vs 22.61% for FLQL. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLQL has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPAI or FLQL?

Over the 1-year period, CPAI has performed better with a 44.76% return vs 22.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPAI or FLQL?

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CPAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPAI or FLQL?

FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.71% for CPAI.

What is the main difference between CPAI and FLQL?

CPAI is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FLQL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CPAI and 0.15% for FLQL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.