PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWS vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COWS vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COWS vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
-0.15%15.29%11.08%9.28%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
-12.20%32.64%53.12%44.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK's -12.20% return.


COWS

1D
0.38%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
3.56%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLOK

1D
0.28%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
-12.20%
6M
-25.52%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
40.64%
5Y*
1.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COWS vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COWS vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWS
COWS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWS vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWSBLOKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.77

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.02

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

2.49

+2.67

COWS vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWS and BLOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWSBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.77

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.39

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between COWS and BLOK is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COWS vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than BLOK's 0.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
1.77%2.04%2.08%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.82%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Drawdowns

COWS vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and BLOK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COWSBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-73.33%

+48.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-35.64%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-32.12%

+27.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-26.27%

+22.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

14.58%

-10.75%

Volatility

COWS vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) is 4.16%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that COWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COWSBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

13.29%

-9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

31.07%

-19.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.88%

42.46%

-19.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

42.92%

-23.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

39.05%

-19.97%