PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWS vs. BATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COWS vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COWS vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
-0.53%15.29%11.08%9.28%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
7.90%59.70%-13.93%-8.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than BATT's 7.90% return.


COWS

1D
1.78%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
4.15%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BATT

1D
4.20%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
7.90%
6M
16.74%
1Y
81.61%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COWS vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COWS vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWS
COWS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BATT
BATT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWS vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWSBATTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

2.54

-1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

2.97

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.41

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

4.31

-3.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.25

16.05

-10.80

COWS vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWS and BATT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWSBATTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.54

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

-0.05

+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between COWS and BATT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COWS vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than BATT's 1.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
1.77%2.04%2.08%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
1.72%1.85%3.17%3.23%4.14%2.32%0.21%3.22%0.89%

Drawdowns

COWS vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and BATT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COWSBATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-69.38%

+44.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-18.00%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-16.31%

+11.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-35.41%

+31.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

4.83%

-1.01%

Volatility

COWS vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) is 4.20%, while Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that COWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COWSBATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

14.03%

-9.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

25.15%

-13.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.88%

32.37%

-9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

29.25%

-10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.10%

30.55%

-11.45%