COPZ vs. IBTG
COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPZ is a Copper fund actively managed by Defiance, while IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. COPZ is actively managed, while IBTG is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTG.
Performance
COPZ vs. IBTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPZ
- 1D
- -12.01%
- 1M
- -13.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- —
COPZ vs. IBTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -28.95% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPZ and IBTG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPZ vs. IBTG — Risk / Return Rank
COPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTG
COPZ vs. IBTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPZ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 4.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 60.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 246.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPZ vs. IBTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than IBTG's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and IBTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPZ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -13.62% | -36.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.30% | 0.00% | -41.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.87% | -4.85% | -24.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
COPZ vs. IBTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPZ | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.79% | 0.50% | +110.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.79% | 3.25% | +107.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.79% | 3.44% | +107.35% |
COPZ vs. IBTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTG's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPZ vs. IBTG - Dividend Comparison
COPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 4.03% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPZ and IBTG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.
IBTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.00% for COPZ.
COPZ is categorized as Copper, while IBTG is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 0.07% for IBTG.
Find the right allocation for COPZ and IBTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer