COPZ vs. AGQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - COPZ is a Copper fund actively managed by Defiance, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). COPZ is actively managed, while AGQ is passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.

Performance

COPZ vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COPZ

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: 4.49%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AGQ

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -11.11%
• 6M: -60.08%
• YTD: -58.79%
• 1Y: 29.99%
• 3Y*: 28.23%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 1.23%
• ALL TIME*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	$125.84M	$135.44M	$281.05M
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF	$216.59K	$238.58K	$612.59K

COPZ vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF	-33.13%
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	-46.75%

Correlation

The correlation between COPZ and AGQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

COPZ vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AGQ

AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPZ vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPZ	AGQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.62	—

Drawdowns

COPZ vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -51.59%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and AGQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPZ	AGQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.59%	-98.16%	+46.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-85.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-85.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-85.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.74%	-91.25%	+46.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-79.93%	+46.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	51.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COPZ	AGQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	127.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	106.63%	125.49%	-18.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	106.63%	76.26%	+30.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	106.63%	66.42%	+40.21%

COPZ vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPZ vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither COPZ nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPZ and AGQ in my portfolio?

COPZ and AGQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COPZ or AGQ?

On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPZ or AGQ?

AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPZ or AGQ?

COPZ and AGQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between COPZ and AGQ?

COPZ is categorized as Copper, while AGQ is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 0.93% for AGQ.