PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPZ vs. GLDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPZ vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COPZ

1D
7.43%
1M
34.29%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDW

1D
0.32%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
2.22%
6M
4.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPZ vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COPZ and GLDW is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPZ vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COPZ vs. GLDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPZGLDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.49

-0.43

Drawdowns

COPZ vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and GLDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPZGLDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.79%

-23.59%

-26.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.79%

-21.57%

+5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.62%

-8.84%

-19.78%

Volatility

COPZ vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPZGLDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.76%

36.99%

+67.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.76%

36.99%

+67.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.76%

36.99%

+67.77%

COPZ vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPZ vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison

COPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.25%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COPZ and GLDW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COPZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COPZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.25%, compared with 0.00% for COPZ.

COPZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 0.99% for GLDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPZ and GLDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer