COP vs. UL
COP (ConocoPhillips Company) and UL (The Unilever Group) are both stocks. COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, COP returned 13.66%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for UL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COP vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 13.66%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
COP
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 26.87%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
UL
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- 1Y
- -13.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
COP vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 26.87% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
UL The Unilever Group | -8.35% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between COP and UL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988 | 0.22 |
The correlation between COP and UL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COP:
$143.30B
UL:
$129.35B
COP:
$5.90
UL:
€5.06
COP:
19.83
UL:
10.06
COP:
1.15
UL:
1.97
COP:
2.49
UL:
1.09
COP:
2.22
UL:
7.20
COP:
$58.31B
UL:
€109.27B
COP:
$17.02B
UL:
€90.89B
COP:
$22.44B
UL:
€24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COP vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
COP
UL
COP vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COP | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.60 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | -1.23 | +5.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COP vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COP | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.55% | -53.55% | -31.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -25.09% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.19% | -25.09% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -26.53% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.66% | -30.13% | -40.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -19.64% | +7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.49% | -10.61% | -14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 12.20% | -5.40% |
Volatility
COP vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
ConocoPhillips Company (COP) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to The Unilever Group (UL) at 6.11%. This indicates that COP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COP | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 6.11% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.05% | 16.78% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.33% | 21.50% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 20.87% | +11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.64% | 21.61% | +16.03% |
Dividends
COP vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than UL's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.82% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
UL The Unilever Group | 3.87% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
COP vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COP vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COP and UL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COP has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to UL (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COP dropped -84.55% vs UL's -53.55%.
COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COP and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer