PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COP vs. VLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

COP vs. VLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COP vs. VLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
42.11%-2.34%-12.02%1.98%71.69%86.60%-36.04%6.63%15.63%11.95%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
52.71%36.97%-2.96%5.86%74.95%40.25%-35.69%30.27%-15.73%38.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COP:

$162.88B

VLO:

$74.87B

EPS

COP:

$6.39

VLO:

$7.74

PE Ratio

COP:

20.64

VLO:

31.93

PEG Ratio

COP:

1.20

VLO:

0.12

PS Ratio

COP:

2.76

VLO:

0.61

PB Ratio

COP:

2.53

VLO:

2.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

COP:

$59.65B

VLO:

$124.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COP:

$17.61B

VLO:

$6.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

COP:

$25.38B

VLO:

$6.49B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 42.11% return, which is significantly lower than VLO's 52.71% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed VLO with an annualized return of 16.28%, while VLO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return.


COP

1D
-0.67%
1M
16.34%
YTD
42.11%
6M
41.94%
1Y
30.00%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
23.95%
10Y*
16.28%

VLO

1D
-1.27%
1M
20.74%
YTD
52.71%
6M
46.93%
1Y
92.58%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
31.29%
10Y*
19.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COP vs. VLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COP
COP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VLO
VLO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COP vs. VLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Valero Energy Corporation (VLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPVLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

2.40

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

2.86

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

4.30

-2.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

12.77

-9.86

COP vs. VLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COP Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the VLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COP and VLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPVLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.40

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.86

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.48

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.28

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between COP and VLO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COP vs. VLO - Dividend Comparison

COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than VLO's 1.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.45%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
1.86%2.78%3.49%3.14%3.09%5.22%6.93%3.84%4.27%2.34%3.51%2.40%

Drawdowns

COP vs. VLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, roughly equal to the maximum VLO drawdown of -87.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and VLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COPVLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.55%

-87.50%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.09%

-21.72%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-41.22%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.66%

-71.88%

+1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.85%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-34.39%

+8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.45%

7.32%

+4.13%

Volatility

COP vs. VLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) is 6.82%, while Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that COP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COPVLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

11.92%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.55%

25.37%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.39%

38.84%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.78%

36.71%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.68%

40.18%

-2.50%

Financials

COP vs. VLO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Valero Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
14.19B
31.73B
(COP) Total Revenue
(VLO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COP vs. VLO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ConocoPhillips Company and Valero Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
39.8%
10.3%
Portfolio components
COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 5.64B and revenue of 14.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

VLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.26B and revenue of 31.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 2.44B and revenue of 14.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

VLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 1.58B and revenue of 31.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 14.19B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

VLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Valero Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.17B and revenue of 31.73B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.