PortfoliosLab logo
COP vs. PSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COP and PSX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

COP vs. PSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COP:

-0.65

PSX:

-0.30

Sortino Ratio

COP:

-0.77

PSX:

-0.26

Omega Ratio

COP:

0.89

PSX:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

COP:

-0.60

PSX:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

COP:

-1.48

PSX:

-0.83

Ulcer Index

COP:

14.74%

PSX:

14.51%

Daily Std Dev

COP:

32.64%

PSX:

34.97%

Max Drawdown

COP:

-70.66%

PSX:

-64.21%

Current Drawdown

COP:

-27.68%

PSX:

-24.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COP:

$116.64B

PSX:

$48.35B

EPS

COP:

$7.81

PSX:

$4.44

PE Ratio

COP:

11.81

PSX:

26.73

PEG Ratio

COP:

8.24

PSX:

0.78

PS Ratio

COP:

1.97

PSX:

0.35

PB Ratio

COP:

1.71

PSX:

1.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

COP:

$58.53B

PSX:

$137.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COP:

$23.47B

PSX:

$8.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

COP:

$25.52B

PSX:

$5.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than PSX's 11.21% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed PSX with an annualized return of 6.97%, while PSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.


COP

YTD

-4.27%

1M

9.01%

6M

-14.20%

1Y

-20.96%

5Y*

22.94%

10Y*

6.97%

PSX

YTD

11.21%

1M

28.95%

6M

0.10%

1Y

-10.45%

5Y*

16.71%

10Y*

8.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COP vs. PSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COP is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COP is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COP is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COP is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COP is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COP is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSX is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSX is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSX is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COP vs. PSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current COP Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the PSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COP and PSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

COP vs. PSX - Dividend Comparison

COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than PSX's 3.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.27%2.54%3.37%4.20%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%
PSX
Phillips 66
3.66%3.95%3.15%3.68%5.00%5.15%3.14%3.60%2.70%2.84%2.67%2.64%

Drawdowns

COP vs. PSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -70.66%, which is greater than PSX's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and PSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

COP vs. PSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) is 8.94%, while Phillips 66 (PSX) has a volatility of 11.18%. This indicates that COP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

COP vs. PSX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Phillips 66. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
17.10B
30.43B
(COP) Total Revenue
(PSX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COP vs. PSX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ConocoPhillips Company and Phillips 66 over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
63.8%
6.5%
(COP) Gross Margin
(PSX) Gross Margin
COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 10.91B and revenue of 17.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

PSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 1.98B and revenue of 30.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.5%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 8.41B and revenue of 17.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

PSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of -395.00M and revenue of 30.43B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.85B and revenue of 17.10B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

PSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 487.00M and revenue of 30.43B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.