COP vs. SHW
COP (ConocoPhillips Company) and SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) are both stocks. COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, COP returned 13.66%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for SHW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COP vs. SHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -1.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with COP having a 13.66% annualized return and SHW not far behind at 13.58%.
COP
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 26.87%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -4.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
COP vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 26.87% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between COP and SHW is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.20 |
The correlation between COP and SHW shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COP:
$143.30B
SHW:
$78.72B
COP:
$5.90
SHW:
$10.42
COP:
19.83
SHW:
30.45
COP:
1.15
SHW:
2.96
COP:
2.49
SHW:
3.31
COP:
2.22
SHW:
17.77
COP:
$58.31B
SHW:
$23.94B
COP:
$17.02B
SHW:
$11.76B
COP:
$22.44B
SHW:
$4.29B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COP vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank
COP
SHW
COP vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COP | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.47 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | -0.99 | +5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COP vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and SHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COP | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.55% | -52.02% | -32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -21.36% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.19% | -25.69% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -42.46% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.66% | -42.46% | -28.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -19.53% | +7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.49% | -11.63% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 10.28% | -3.48% |
Volatility
COP vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison
ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) have volatilities of 8.72% and 9.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COP | SHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 9.00% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.05% | 19.26% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.33% | 25.46% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 26.27% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.64% | 26.58% | +11.06% |
Dividends
COP vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison
COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than SHW's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.82% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
COP vs. SHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COP vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COP and SHW have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to COP (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COP dropped -84.55% vs SHW's -52.02%.
COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COP and SHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer