COP vs. HAL
COP (ConocoPhillips Company) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — COP in Oil & Gas E&P, HAL in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services. Over the past 10 years, COP returned 13.66%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for HAL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
COP vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 13.66%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.88% annualized return.
COP
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 26.87%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 7.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
COP vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 26.87% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between COP and HAL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1981 | 0.54 |
The correlation between COP and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COP:
$143.30B
HAL:
$33.22B
COP:
$5.90
HAL:
$1.82
COP:
19.83
HAL:
21.80
COP:
1.15
HAL:
3.48
COP:
2.49
HAL:
1.51
COP:
2.22
HAL:
3.07
COP:
$58.31B
HAL:
$22.17B
COP:
$17.02B
HAL:
$3.40B
COP:
$22.44B
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COP vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
COP
HAL
COP vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COP | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 6.47 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | 16.47 | -12.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COP vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COP | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.55% | -92.99% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -13.10% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.19% | -54.01% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.19% | -54.01% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.66% | -91.45% | +20.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -32.89% | +20.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.49% | -39.12% | +13.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 5.14% | +1.66% |
Volatility
COP vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) is 8.72%, while Halliburton Company (HAL) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that COP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COP | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 9.32% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.05% | 24.13% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.33% | 36.76% | -7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 40.18% | -7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.64% | 45.96% | -8.32% |
Dividends
COP vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than HAL's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.82% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
COP vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COP vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COP and HAL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to COP (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COP dropped -84.55% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COP and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer