PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMP vs. EMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COMP vs. EMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass, Inc. (COMP) and Emera Inc (EMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMP achieves a -28.29% return, which is significantly lower than EMA's 5.65% return.


COMP

1D
-1.69%
1M
-13.07%
YTD
-28.29%
6M
-27.26%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
29.13%
5Y*
-12.67%
10Y*

EMA

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
5.65%
6M
10.36%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMP vs. EMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COMP
Compass, Inc.
-28.29%76.76%
EMA
Emera Inc
5.65%11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between COMP and EMA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

-0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COMP:

$6.24B

EMA:

$15.54B

EPS

COMP:

$0.02

EMA:

$3.55

PE Ratio

COMP:

340.65

EMA:

14.37

PS Ratio

COMP:

0.58

EMA:

1.79

PB Ratio

COMP:

2.21

EMA:

1.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

COMP:

$8.31B

EMA:

$8.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COMP:

$893.40M

EMA:

$2.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

COMP:

-$177.70M

EMA:

$2.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMP vs. EMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMP
COMP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
COMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA
EMA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMP vs. EMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass, Inc. (COMP) and Emera Inc (EMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMPEMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.52

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

9.44

-8.58

COMP vs. EMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the EMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMP and EMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMPEMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

1.54

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

1.38

-1.60

Drawdowns

COMP vs. EMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMP drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, which is greater than EMA's maximum drawdown of -5.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMP and EMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMPEMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.82%

-5.93%

-84.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.81%

-5.93%

-44.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.38%

-4.74%

-57.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.53%

-1.76%

-64.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.81%

2.20%

+21.61%

Volatility

COMP vs. EMA - Volatility Comparison

Compass, Inc. (COMP) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to Emera Inc (EMA) at 4.67%. This indicates that COMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMPEMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.24%

4.67%

+14.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.82%

10.21%

+40.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.40%

13.60%

+49.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.89%

13.72%

+66.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.07%

13.72%

+65.35%

Dividends

COMP vs. EMA - Dividend Comparison

COMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.


PositionTTM2025
COMP
Compass, Inc.
0.00%0.00%
EMA
Emera Inc
3.87%2.12%

Financials

COMP vs. EMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compass, Inc. and Emera Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.70B
2.48B
(COMP) Total Revenue
(EMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COMP vs. EMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Compass, Inc. and Emera Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
30.5%
Portfolio components
COMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 756.95M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

COMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported an operating income of -351.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -13.0%.

EMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 626.62M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

COMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a net income of 22.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.

EMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 583.50M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COMP and EMA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMP has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to EMA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMP dropped -90.82% vs EMA's -5.93%.

EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMP and EMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer