PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMP vs. SSRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COMP vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass, Inc. (COMP) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMP achieves a -18.35% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 35.99% return.


COMP

1D
2.13%
1M
16.78%
YTD
-18.35%
6M
-18.28%
1Y
47.77%
3Y*
30.31%
5Y*
-8.99%
10Y*

SSRM

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
35.99%
6M
37.37%
1Y
135.09%
3Y*
26.26%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMP vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COMP
Compass, Inc.
-18.35%80.68%55.59%61.37%-74.37%-54.89%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
35.99%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%17.32%

Correlation

The correlation between COMP and SSRM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COMP:

$7.11B

SSRM:

$6.49B

EPS

COMP:

$0.02

SSRM:

$3.27

PE Ratio

COMP:

387.84

SSRM:

9.13

PS Ratio

COMP:

0.66

SSRM:

3.40

PB Ratio

COMP:

2.52

SSRM:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

COMP:

$8.31B

SSRM:

$1.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COMP:

$893.40M

SSRM:

$643.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

COMP:

-$177.70M

SSRM:

$835.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMP vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMP
COMP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
COMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMP Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMP vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass, Inc. (COMP) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMPSSRMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

2.08

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

2.58

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

4.92

-4.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.99

13.51

-11.53

COMP vs. SSRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SSRM Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMP and SSRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMPSSRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.08

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.22

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.11

-0.30

Drawdowns

COMP vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMP drawdown since its inception was -90.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMP and SSRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMPSSRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.82%

-91.68%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.81%

-30.88%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.24%

-73.41%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.25%

-83.16%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.17%

-31.52%

-25.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.55%

-57.18%

-9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.18%

11.25%

+11.93%

Volatility

COMP vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison

Compass, Inc. (COMP) has a higher volatility of 29.23% compared to SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) at 21.40%. This indicates that COMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMPSSRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.23%

21.40%

+7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.13%

52.69%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.13%

65.69%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.74%

55.69%

+24.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.99%

52.85%

+26.14%

Dividends

COMP vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMP nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
COMP
Compass, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

COMP vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compass, Inc. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.70B
581.78M
(COMP) Total Revenue
(SSRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COMP vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Compass, Inc. and SSR Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
COMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported an operating income of -351.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -13.0%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

COMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Compass, Inc. reported a net income of 22.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COMP and SSRM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMP has higher volatility (29.23%) compared to SSRM (21.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMP dropped -90.82% vs SSRM's -91.68%.

SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMP and SSRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer