CNXT vs. SPY
CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNXT returned 7.66%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for SPY. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
CNXT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 41.99% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 7.66%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
CNXT
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 41.99%
- 6M
- 39.66%
- 1Y
- 119.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
CNXT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 41.99% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.25% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and SPY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CNXT and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CNXT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNXT
SPY
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
CNXT
SPY
Technology
CNXT
SPY
Basic Materials
CNXT
SPY
Healthcare
CNXT
SPY
Financial Services
CNXT
SPY
Consumer Defensive
CNXT
SPY
Communication Services
CNXT
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
CNXT
SPY
Energy
CNXT
-
SPY
Real Estate
CNXT
-
SPY
Utilities
CNXT
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
SPY
CNXT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.33 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.87 | 2.52 | +7.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.07 | 11.15 | +17.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -55.19% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -8.88% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | -18.76% | -29.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -24.50% | -36.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | -33.72% | -29.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -3.08% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.74% | -9.03% | -33.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 2.00% | +2.14% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 12.73% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.79%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.73% | 4.79% | +7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 9.80% | +12.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.39% | 12.43% | +19.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 17.15% | +18.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.78% | 17.95% | +13.83% |
CNXT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SPY's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and SPY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (12.73%) compared to SPY (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.75% vs 7.66% for CNXT. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNXT.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.
CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.09% for SPY.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer