CNXT vs. JCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI).
CNXT and JCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. JCHI is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 15, 2023.
Performance
CNXT vs. JCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNXT vs. JCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 3.20% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -20.75% |
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | -4.46% | 27.66% | 13.77% | -17.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than JCHI's -4.46% return.
CNXT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
JCHI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -4.46%
- 6M
- -11.12%
- 1Y
- 9.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNXT vs. JCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CNXT and JCHI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. JCHI — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
JCHI
CNXT vs. JCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNXT | JCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 0.46 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 0.74 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.10 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 0.57 | +3.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 1.66 | +11.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNXT | JCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 0.46 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and JCHI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNXT vs. JCHI - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than JCHI's 1.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | 1.89% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. JCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than JCHI's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and JCHI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | JCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -29.57% | -39.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -15.93% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.37% | -11.98% | -12.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.41% | -13.67% | -29.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 5.64% | -0.91% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. JCHI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) at 5.77%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | JCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 5.77% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.80% | 12.55% | +7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.89% | 20.80% | +11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 25.16% | +9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.54% | 25.16% | +6.38% |