PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNXT vs. JCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNXT vs. JCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNXT vs. JCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
3.20%59.31%12.42%-20.75%
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
-4.46%27.66%13.77%-17.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than JCHI's -4.46% return.


CNXT

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
3.20%
6M
2.49%
1Y
65.33%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
3.87%

JCHI

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-11.12%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNXT vs. JCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CNXT and JCHI have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Return for Risk

CNXT vs. JCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

JCHI
JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. JCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNXTJCHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

0.46

+1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

0.74

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.10

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

0.57

+3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.62

1.66

+11.96

CNXT vs. JCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the JCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and JCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNXTJCHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.46

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.19

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and JCHI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CNXT vs. JCHI - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than JCHI's 1.89% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.17%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
1.89%1.81%2.12%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. JCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than JCHI's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and JCHI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNXTJCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.98%

-29.57%

-39.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-15.93%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.37%

-11.98%

-12.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.41%

-13.67%

-29.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

5.64%

-0.91%

Volatility

CNXT vs. JCHI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) at 5.77%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNXTJCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

5.77%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.80%

12.55%

+7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.89%

20.80%

+11.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.92%

25.16%

+9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.54%

25.16%

+6.38%