CNXT vs. IBIC
CNXT (VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the ChiNext Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CNXT returned 60.48% vs 3.98% for IBIC. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
CNXT vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.63% return.
CNXT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 60.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.87%
IBIC
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.63M | $5.30M | $7.79M | |
| $985.11K | $822.88K | $536.84K |
CNXT vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF | 14.74% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -4.11% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.63% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.06 |
The correlation between CNXT and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
IBIC
CNXT vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 2.07 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 14.92 | -12.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.78 | 50.81 | -42.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -0.90% | -68.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.23% | -0.27% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.53% | -0.12% | -19.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.48% | -0.10% | -42.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 0.08% | +6.83% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 16.94% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.94% | 0.23% | +16.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.59% | 0.69% | +27.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 0.88% | +36.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.14% | 1.54% | +34.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.27% | 1.54% | +30.73% |
CNXT vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF | 0.16% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, CNXT leads with 60.48% vs 3.98% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 60.48% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNXT.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.16% for CNXT.
CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CNXT tracks ChiNext Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer