CNXT vs. CQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNXT tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index while CQQQ tracks the AlphaShares China Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNXT returned 6.63%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for CQQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 33.52% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 6.63%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.40% annualized return.

CNXT

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 10.51%
• YTD: 33.52%
• 6M: 41.38%
• 1Y: 119.62%
• 3Y*: 26.28%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 32.76%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: -7.50%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	33.52%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.46%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and CQQQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2014	0.67

The correlation between CNXT and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNXT	CQQQ
Technology	43.8%	58.2%
Industrials	33.2%	1.3%
Healthcare	7.0%	-
Financial Services	5.6%	0.1%
Basic Materials	4.1%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	-
Communication Services	2.5%	21.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	13.8%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CNXT vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 28
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNXT	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	1.11	+2.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	1.68	+2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.20	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.85	1.35	+8.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.18	3.16	+27.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNXT	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92	1.11	+2.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	-0.20	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.16	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.19	+0.04

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNXT	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.98%	-73.99%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-24.41%	+12.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.60%	-35.93%	-12.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.21%	-66.96%	+5.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.30%	-73.99%	+10.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-49.18%	+47.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.94%	-28.29%	-14.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	10.39%	-6.41%

Volatility

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is 10.24%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that CNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNXT	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.24%	11.60%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.98%	21.88%	-1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.74%	29.78%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.27%	38.02%	-2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.64%	33.30%	-1.66%

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNXT vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CQQQ's 2.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.13%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.11%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNXT and CQQQ in my portfolio?

CNXT and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNXT or CQQQ?

CQQQ has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to CNXT (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

Which ETF is better, CNXT or CQQQ?

On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 6.63% vs 5.40% for CQQQ. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CNXT has been the lower-risk option at 10.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNXT or CQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNXT or CQQQ?

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNXT or CQQQ?

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.

What is the main difference between CNXT and CQQQ?

CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.