CQQQ vs. CWEB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both China Equities funds - CQQQ tracks the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index while CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CQQQ returned -6.40%/yr vs -34.28%/yr for CWEB. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CQQQ charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.

Performance

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -36.03% return.

CQQQ

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -6.83%
• 6M: -9.86%
• YTD: -3.27%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 6.42%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: 4.48%
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

CWEB

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 28.79%
• 6M: -39.78%
• YTD: -36.03%
• 1Y: -33.46%
• 3Y*: -15.58%
• 5Y*: -34.28%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -19.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	$60.75M	$69.64M	$78.22M
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	$13.22M	$13.80M	$17.15M

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-3.27%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	-36.03%	29.04%	0.12%	-32.85%	-59.43%	-79.35%	116.38%	51.24%	-63.01%	166.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and CWEB is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016	0.89

The correlation between CQQQ and CWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CQQQ	CWEB
Technology	57.0%	4.2%
Communication Services	24.7%	46.2%
Consumer Cyclical	16.5%	34.0%
Industrials	1.2%	-
Financial Services	0.5%	2.0%
Basic Materials	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	4.0%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	5.8%
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

CWEB

CWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
CWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CQQQ	CWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	-0.67	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	-0.78	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.91	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	-0.53	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	-0.92	+1.79

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the CWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and CWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and CWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQQQ	CWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.99%	-98.18%	+24.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	-69.36%	+44.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.42%	-69.36%	+34.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.09%	-92.51%	+30.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.02%	-97.39%	+45.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.49%	-66.00%	+37.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.28%	40.38%	-29.10%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is 12.09%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 15.76%. This indicates that CQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CQQQ	CWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	15.76%	-3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.80%	41.53%	-16.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.54%	55.64%	-23.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.19%	93.18%	-54.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.56%	80.32%	-46.76%

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CQQQ vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than CWEB's 5.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.24%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	5.68%	2.77%	4.59%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%	1.59%	2.98%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CQQQ and CWEB in my portfolio?

CQQQ and CWEB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CQQQ or CWEB?

CWEB has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to CQQQ (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQQQ dropped -73.99% vs CWEB's -98.18%.

Which ETF is better, CQQQ or CWEB?

On 5-year performance, CQQQ leads with -6.40% vs -34.28% for CWEB. On fees, CQQQ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, CQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CQQQ or CWEB?

Over the 5-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a -6.40% return vs -34.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CQQQ or CWEB?

CQQQ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CQQQ or CWEB?

CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 2.24% for CQQQ.

What is the main difference between CQQQ and CWEB?

CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CQQQ and 1.30% for CWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.