CNQ vs. SYF
CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) and SYF (Synchrony Financial) are both stocks. CNQ operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while SYF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CNQ returned 16.77%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for SYF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNQ vs. SYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 35.33% return, which is significantly higher than SYF's -12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has outperformed SYF with an annualized return of 16.77%, while SYF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.
CNQ
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 33.05%
- YTD
- 35.33%
- 1Y
- 53.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 29.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.45%
SYF
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- 30.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.20%
CNQ vs. SYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 35.33% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | -19.06% | 39.72% | -29.92% | 15.97% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | -12.74% | 30.64% | 74.01% | 19.76% | -27.43% | 36.40% | -0.08% | 57.48% | -37.84% | 8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and SYF is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2014 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CNQ and SYF shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNQ:
$93.65B
SYF:
$24.29B
CNQ:
CA$4.66
SYF:
$9.97
CNQ:
13.56
SYF:
7.24
CNQ:
0.65
SYF:
0.69
CNQ:
3.23
SYF:
1.31
CNQ:
2.96
SYF:
1.64
CNQ:
CA$40.74B
SYF:
$19.92B
CNQ:
CA$12.53B
SYF:
$12.16B
CNQ:
CA$22.99B
SYF:
$4.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQ vs. SYF — Risk / Return Rank
CNQ
SYF
CNQ vs. SYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNQ | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.06 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 0.21 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 0.43 | +7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. SYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than SYF's maximum drawdown of -66.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and SYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQ | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -66.37% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.45% | -27.61% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -37.75% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -46.65% | +10.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.84% | -66.37% | -11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.38% | -17.71% | +8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -16.97% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 13.33% | -6.30% |
Volatility
CNQ vs. SYF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) is 8.75%, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that CNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNQ | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 12.88% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.46% | 24.55% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.76% | 31.24% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.71% | 36.87% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 39.39% | +0.85% |
Dividends
CNQ vs. SYF - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than SYF's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.93% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 2.51% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 1.45% | 0.72% | 0.00% |
Financials
CNQ vs. SYF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Synchrony Financial. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNQ vs. SYF - Profitability Comparison
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
SYF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a gross profit of 4.64B and revenue of 5.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.7%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
SYF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported an operating income of 914.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
SYF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Synchrony Financial reported a net income of 805.00M and revenue of 5.60B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNQ and SYF have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYF has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to CNQ (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNQ dropped -80.75% vs SYF's -66.37%.
CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNQ and SYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer