CNGLX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
CNGLX is managed by Commonwealth Intl Series Tr. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGLX Commonwealth Global Fund | -3.38% | 6.46% | 6.79% | 12.94% | -19.81% | 13.45% | 14.71% | 21.78% | -13.16% | 15.60% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNGLX achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CNGLX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 5.16%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
CNGLX
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- -3.78%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNGLX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNGLX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
CNGLX
FGIAX
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.79 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 2.30 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 2.73 | -2.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 12.62 | -10.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.79 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.80 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.42 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNGLX and FGIAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
CNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGLX Commonwealth Global Fund | 3.67% | 3.54% | 3.37% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 0.00% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.14%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNGLX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.14% | -49.35% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -8.29% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | -21.08% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -38.02% | +4.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -3.06% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -7.22% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.79% | +1.18% |
Volatility
CNGLX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that CNGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNGLX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.15% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.84% | 7.07% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 12.28% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 13.08% | +1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 15.17% | +1.12% |