CNGLX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
CNGLX is managed by Commonwealth Intl Series Tr. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGLX Commonwealth Global Fund | -5.21% | 6.46% | 6.79% | 12.94% | -19.81% | 13.45% | 14.71% | 21.78% | -13.16% | 15.60% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNGLX achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CNGLX has underperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.48% annualized return.
CNGLX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 1.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNGLX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNGLX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
CNGLX
CSUAX
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNGLX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 1.63 | -1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 2.17 | -1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 2.36 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 10.32 | -9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNGLX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 1.63 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.61 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.50 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNGLX and CSUAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
CNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNGLX Commonwealth Global Fund | 3.74% | 3.54% | 3.37% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.14%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNGLX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNGLX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.14% | -52.20% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -7.98% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | -20.45% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -35.05% | +1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.33% | -4.38% | -4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -8.49% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.83% | +1.10% |
Volatility
CNGLX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that CNGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNGLX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 3.26% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 6.89% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 11.48% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 12.89% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 14.89% | +1.39% |