CNDT vs. EQT
CNDT (Conduent Incorporated) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. CNDT operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, CNDT returned -25.21%/yr vs 25.41%/yr for EQT. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CNDT vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDT achieves a -18.23% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's -0.02% return.
CNDT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- YTD
- -18.23%
- 1Y
- -36.18%
- 3Y*
- -22.93%
- 5Y*
- -25.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.92%
EQT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 25.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13M | $1.20M | $1.94M | |
| $436.52M | $391.65M | $390.40M |
CNDT vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDT Conduent Incorporated | -18.23% | -52.48% | 10.68% | -9.88% | -24.16% | 11.25% | -22.58% | -41.67% | -34.22% | 8.86% |
EQT EQT Corporation | -0.02% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDT and EQT is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CNDT and EQT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNDT:
$243.50M
EQT:
$33.33B
CNDT:
-$1.45
EQT:
$4.55
CNDT:
0.05
EQT:
3.59
CNDT:
$3.01B
EQT:
$9.29B
CNDT:
$419.00M
EQT:
$6.78B
CNDT:
$122.00M
EQT:
$6.93B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDT vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
CNDT
EQT
CNDT vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNDT | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.03 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.01 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 0.02 | -1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNDT vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDT and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDT | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.02% | -91.51% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.81% | -27.89% | -32.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.76% | -31.62% | -42.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.43% | -42.56% | -41.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.25% | -21.33% | -71.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.72% | -23.34% | -42.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.44% | 12.69% | +26.75% |
Volatility
CNDT vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 10.22%. This indicates that CNDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDT | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 10.22% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.89% | 20.66% | +31.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.45% | 30.59% | +36.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.80% | 42.13% | +10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.46% | 48.96% | +14.50% |
Dividends
CNDT vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
CNDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDT Conduent Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.22% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
CNDT vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conduent Incorporated and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNDT vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
CNDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Conduent Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 723.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.
CNDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Conduent Incorporated reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 723.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 394.04M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
CNDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Conduent Incorporated reported a net income of -33.00M and revenue of 723.00M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 281.45M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNDT and EQT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNDT has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to EQT (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNDT dropped -95.02% vs EQT's -91.51%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNDT and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer