CNDT vs. EQT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) and EQT Corporation (EQT).

Performance

CNDT vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNDT vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNDT Conduent Incorporated	-33.33%	-52.48%	10.68%	-9.88%	-24.16%	11.25%	-22.58%	-41.67%	-34.22%	17.78%
EQT EQT Corporation	19.07%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	-10.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CNDT : $196.87M EQT : $39.75B
EPS CNDT : -$1.07 EQT : $3.30
PS Ratio CNDT : 0.07 EQT : 4.55
PB Ratio CNDT : 0.29 EQT : 1.67
Total Revenue (TTM) CNDT : $3.04B EQT : $8.64B
Gross Profit (TTM) CNDT : $552.00M EQT : $8.42B
EBITDA (TTM) CNDT : $105.00M EQT : $5.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDT achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 19.07% return.

CNDT

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -12.33%
• YTD: -33.33%
• 6M: -54.29%
• 1Y: -52.59%
• 3Y*: -28.00%
• 5Y*: -28.65%
• 10Y*: —

EQT

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 27.75%
• 5Y*: 29.08%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CNDT vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDT

CNDT Risk / Return Rank: 7
CNDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CNDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CNDT Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CNDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
CNDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 61
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDT vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNDT	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	0.57	-1.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.21	0.95	-2.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.13	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	1.17	-2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.83	2.31	-4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNDT vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDT and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNDT	EQT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.86	0.57	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.57	0.67	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.32	-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between CNDT and EQT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CNDT vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

CNDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNDT Conduent Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQT EQT Corporation	1.01%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%

Drawdowns

CNDT vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDT and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNDT	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.02%	-91.51%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.81%	-18.39%	-42.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.04%	-42.56%	-43.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.50%	-6.32%	-88.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.73%	-23.38%	-41.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.41%	9.29%	+20.12%

Volatility

CNDT vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.04%. This indicates that CNDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNDT	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.37%	8.04%	+8.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.14%	23.63%	+26.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.23%	35.89%	+25.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.33%	43.78%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.11%	48.95%	+14.16%

Financials