CNBS vs. HACK

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. CNBS is actively managed, while HACK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNBS returned -33.59%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for HACK. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNBS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.

Performance

CNBS vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -4.24% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 19.78% return.

CNBS

• 1D: 4.39%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: -4.24%
• 6M: -5.64%
• 1Y: 82.94%
• 3Y*: -3.50%
• 5Y*: -33.59%
• 10Y*: —

HACK

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 19.78%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 13.34%
• 3Y*: 25.46%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: 16.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNBS vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	-4.24%	15.33%	-29.41%	-16.11%	-63.98%	-19.02%	31.94%	-45.72%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	19.78%	7.97%	23.49%	37.44%	-28.16%	7.03%	41.51%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and HACK is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019	0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between CNBS and HACK has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CNBS vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNBS	HACK
Healthcare	63.1%	-
Real Estate	13.8%	-
Technology	10.7%	92.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	-
Financial Services	1.9%	0.1%
Industrials	0.1%	7.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CNBS vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS

CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNBS vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNBS	HACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.52	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	0.86	+1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.11	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	0.65	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	1.51	+1.40

CNBS vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNBS and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and HACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNBS	HACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.71%	-42.68%	-53.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.25%	-20.67%	-30.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.41%	-21.90%	-51.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.44%	-38.68%	-54.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.66%	-8.64%	-83.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.40%	-11.61%	-59.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.58%	8.83%	+19.75%

Volatility

CNBS vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 18.63% compared to Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) at 11.60%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNBS	HACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.63%	11.60%	+7.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.96%	21.92%	+31.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	106.01%	25.98%	+80.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.06%	24.30%	+40.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.34%	23.24%	+38.10%

CNBS vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNBS vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	43.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNBS and HACK in my portfolio?

CNBS and HACK have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNBS or HACK?

CNBS has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to HACK (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNBS dropped -95.71% vs HACK's -42.68%.

Which ETF is better, CNBS or HACK?

On 5-year performance, HACK leads with 9.48% vs -33.59% for CNBS. On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNBS or HACK?

Over the 5-year period, HACK has performed better with a 9.48% return vs -33.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNBS or HACK?

HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNBS or HACK?

HACK has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.

What is the main difference between CNBS and HACK?

CNBS is categorized as Cannabis, while HACK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNBS and 0.60% for HACK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.