PortfoliosLab logo
CNBS vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and QQQ is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CNBS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-51.59%
-4.31%
CNBS
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNBS:

-0.94

QQQ:

0.47

Sortino Ratio

CNBS:

-1.55

QQQ:

0.82

Omega Ratio

CNBS:

0.80

QQQ:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CNBS:

-0.59

QQQ:

0.52

Martin Ratio

CNBS:

-1.24

QQQ:

1.79

Ulcer Index

CNBS:

45.49%

QQQ:

6.64%

Daily Std Dev

CNBS:

60.08%

QQQ:

25.28%

Max Drawdown

CNBS:

-95.63%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

CNBS:

-94.42%

QQQ:

-12.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -26.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -7.43% return.


CNBS

YTD

-26.18%

1M

4.12%

6M

-51.82%

1Y

-56.19%

5Y*

-26.09%

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

-7.43%

1M

-1.88%

6M

-4.30%

1Y

10.31%

5Y*

17.80%

10Y*

16.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNBS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CNBS: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CNBS: 0.75%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQ: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNBS vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNBS is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNBS is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNBS is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNBS is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNBS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNBS is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNBS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNBS, currently valued at -0.94, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CNBS: -0.94
QQQ: 0.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNBS, currently valued at -1.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CNBS: -1.55
QQQ: 0.82
The chart of Omega ratio for CNBS, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CNBS: 0.80
QQQ: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNBS, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CNBS: -0.59
QQQ: 0.52
The chart of Martin ratio for CNBS, currently valued at -1.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CNBS: -1.24
QQQ: 1.79

The current CNBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNBS and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.94
0.47
CNBS
QQQ

Dividends

CNBS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CNBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.01%, more than QQQ's 0.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
59.01%43.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.63%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-94.42%
-12.28%
CNBS
QQQ

Volatility

CNBS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 19.40% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 16.86%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.40%
16.86%
CNBS
QQQ